Distributed Multi-Voting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 189: | Line 189: | ||
Meets Honesty criterion under the same assumptions as the [[Distributed Voting#Tactical vote resistance|Distributed Voting]]. |
Meets Honesty criterion under the same assumptions as the [[Distributed Voting#Tactical vote resistance|Distributed Voting]]. |
||
This system also tries to satisfy the Perfect Honesty criterion, by applying a conversion of the vote which serves to drastically reduce the deviation from the honest |
This system also tries to satisfy the [[Honesty criterion|Perfect Honesty criterion]], by applying a conversion of the vote which serves to drastically reduce the deviation from the honest one. |
||
Example |
Example |
||
Candidates: [A B C D E] |
Candidates: [A B C D E] |
||
Honest vote: [50 30 15 5 0] |
Honest vote: [50 30 15 5 0] |
||
Tactical vote: [90 6 3 1 0] |
Tactical vote: [90 6 3 1 0] |
||
Honest converted vote: [1118 820 486 176 0] Points sum = 2600 |
Honest converted vote: [1118 820 486 176 0] Points sum = 2600 |
||
Tactical |
Tactical coverted vote: [1434 622 390 153 0] Points sum = 2600 |
||
Absolute difference: [316 198 96 23 0] Points sum = 633 |
Absolute difference: [316 198 96 23 0] Points sum = 633 |
||
633 out of 2600 is around 25%. |
633 out of 2600 is around 25%. |
||