EM-list archive: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
Tag: New redirect
(Restoring my first email to EM-list)
Tag: Removed redirect
Line 1: Line 1:
On February 15, 2021, the [[EM-list|election-methods mailing list]] is celebrating its 25th anniversary.
#REDIRECT [[EM-list#25th Anniversary]]



On February 15, 2021, the [[EM-list|election-methods mailing list]] will be celebrating its 25th anniversary.
== The first message ==

<blockquote>
Subject: New "election-methods" list<br/>
From: Rob Lanphier</code> <ref name="robla-at-eskimo">robla@eskimo.com was Rob's personal email address at the time.</ref><br/>
Date: Thu Feb 15 21:34:05 PST 1996<br/>
To: [elections-reform, election-methods]<br/>
<p>
I'm starting up an "election-methods-list" list to discuss single-winner
reform, the relative merits of different PR systems, and the technical
underpinnings of all election methods. This list is intended to
compliment, not to replace, the existing "elections-reform" list.
</p><p>
Please continue to discuss the various electoral reform movements in the
U.S. and throughout the world in the "elections-reform" list.
"elections-reform" is still the best forum for discussing strategies used
in reform campaigns, specific legislation addressing reform, and
educational material about reform.
</p><p>
What is the difference, you ask? "election-methods-list" discussions will
most likely be more technical in nature, with the ultimate goal of
providing recommendations and educational material to the members of
"elections-reform". There have been complaints in the past that
discussions on "elections-reform" have been too technical, and
"election-methods-list" has been created to offload the more prolific
technical discussions to "elections-reform". It lets folks use
"elections-reform" to stay abreast of current activity in electoral
reform without fear of their inbox exploding.
</p><p>
To subscribe to "election-methods-list", send mail to majordomo at eskimo.com
with no subject line (any subject will be ignored), and the following one
line in the body of your message:
</p><p>
subscribe election-methods-list
</p><p>
My apologies to anybody who stumbled on the web page that I set up a week<br/>
ago at [https://web.archive.org/web/19970817085911/http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/politics/index.html http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/cpr/election-methods.html] and tried <br/>
to subscribe (and failed, because the list didn't exist yet). In the time I<br/>
was waiting for the list to get set up, I set up the web page.<br/>
Everything should *now* work according to the instructions on that page.<br/>
</p/><p>
That's all there is to it. Let me know if you have any questions about <br/>
the new list.<br/>
</p><p>
Thanks,<br/>
Rob Lanphier<br/>
[<insert Rob's old email address here>]<br/>
[https://web.archive.org/web/19970825175036/http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/ http://www.eskimo.com/~robla] [<< Rob's old website]
</p>
</code></blockquote>

== Footnotes ==
<references/>

Revision as of 01:01, 16 February 2021

On February 15, 2021, the election-methods mailing list is celebrating its 25th anniversary.


The first message

Subject: New "election-methods" list
From: Rob Lanphier [1]
Date: Thu Feb 15 21:34:05 PST 1996
To: [elections-reform, election-methods]

I'm starting up an "election-methods-list" list to discuss single-winner reform, the relative merits of different PR systems, and the technical underpinnings of all election methods. This list is intended to compliment, not to replace, the existing "elections-reform" list.

Please continue to discuss the various electoral reform movements in the U.S. and throughout the world in the "elections-reform" list. "elections-reform" is still the best forum for discussing strategies used in reform campaigns, specific legislation addressing reform, and educational material about reform.

What is the difference, you ask? "election-methods-list" discussions will most likely be more technical in nature, with the ultimate goal of providing recommendations and educational material to the members of "elections-reform". There have been complaints in the past that discussions on "elections-reform" have been too technical, and "election-methods-list" has been created to offload the more prolific technical discussions to "elections-reform". It lets folks use "elections-reform" to stay abreast of current activity in electoral reform without fear of their inbox exploding.

To subscribe to "election-methods-list", send mail to majordomo at eskimo.com with no subject line (any subject will be ignored), and the following one line in the body of your message:

subscribe election-methods-list

My apologies to anybody who stumbled on the web page that I set up a week
ago at http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/cpr/election-methods.html and tried
to subscribe (and failed, because the list didn't exist yet). In the time I
was waiting for the list to get set up, I set up the web page.
Everything should *now* work according to the instructions on that page.

That's all there is to it. Let me know if you have any questions about
the new list.

Thanks,
Rob Lanphier
[<insert Rob's old email address here>]
http://www.eskimo.com/~robla [<< Rob's old website]

Footnotes

  1. robla@eskimo.com was Rob's personal email address at the time.