Evaluative Proportional Representation: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (add References section) |
m (Improved reference by filling in more information) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
'''Evaluative Proportional Representation''' ('''EPR''') is
Unlike EAR, it doesn't aim to ensure proportionality by seat count. Instead, EPR outputs a set of winners along with the weight that each winner should have in a collective decision process (e.g. in a council or by parliamentary procedure).
{{stub}}
== References ==
<references/>
[[Category:Multi-winner voting methods]]
[[Category:Ranked voting methods]]
|
Latest revision as of 17:52, 5 June 2023
Evaluative Proportional Representation (EPR) is a proportional extension of Majority Judgment, devised by Stephen Bosworth.[1] It is highly related to the Expanding Approvals Rule.
Unlike EAR, it doesn't aim to ensure proportionality by seat count. Instead, EPR outputs a set of winners along with the weight that each winner should have in a collective decision process (e.g. in a council or by parliamentary procedure).
This page is a stub - please add to it.
References
- ↑ Bosworth, Stephen; Corr, Anders; Leonard, Stevan (July 8, 2019). "Legislatures Elected by Evaluative Proportional Representation (EPR): an Algorithm". Journal of Political Risk. 7 (8). Retrieved August 19, 2019.