House monotonicity criterion: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Whoops, removing {{merge from|Median Ratings|discuss=Talk:Median Ratings}}. That goes on the Majority criterion page...) |
m (Minor clarifiaction) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
That is, increasing the number of winners should never evict anyone from the [[winner set]] who is already in it. |
That is, increasing the number of winners should never evict anyone from the [[winner set]] who is already in it. |
||
House monotone multi-member methods are sometimes called proportional orderings or proportional rankings<ref>{{cite web|url=http://9mail-de.spdns.de/m-schulze/schulze2.pdf|title=Free Riding and Vote Management under Proportional Representation by the Single Transferable Vote|date=2011-03-14|author=Markus Schulze|page=42}}</ref>, and James Green-Armytage's [[Proportional Ordering]] is such a method. Sequential methods |
House monotone multi-member methods are sometimes called proportional orderings or proportional rankings<ref>{{cite web|url=http://9mail-de.spdns.de/m-schulze/schulze2.pdf|title=Free Riding and Vote Management under Proportional Representation by the Single Transferable Vote|date=2011-03-14|author=Markus Schulze|page=42}}</ref>, and James Green-Armytage's [[Proportional Ordering]] is such a method. Sequential methods that are based on [[Highest averages method|highest-average methods]] and don't have deletion steps, such as [[sequential Ebert]] and [[Sequential Phragmen|sequential Phragmén]], are also house monotone. |
||
==Related== |
==Related== |
||