Method evaluation poll 2005
Particular methods
Please rate the following methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on merit alone. (That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate?)
binary input
?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Plurality ? Two round runoff ? Approval ?
ranking input
not Condorcet-efficient
?? ?? ?? ?? ?? Borda count ? IRV without equal rankings ? ER-IRV(whole) ? ER-IRV(fractional) ? Bucklin
nearly Condorcet-efficient
?? ?? ?? ?? ?? minmax(pairwise opposition) ? CDTT,IRV ?
Condorcet-efficient
?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ranked pairs(WV) ? ranked pairs(margins) ? beatpath(WV) ? beatpath(margins) ? sequential dropping(WV) ? minmax(WV) ? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? minmax(margins) ? Smith//minmax(WV) ? Smith//minmax(margins) ? Nanson ? Raynaud ?
ranking input with approval cutoff
?? ?? ?? ?? ?? definite majority choice ? approval weighted pairwise ? approval margins ?
rating input
?? ?? ?? ?? ?? range voting ? ranked pairs(cardinal pairwise) ? beatpath(cardinal pairwise) ?
other
?? ?? ?? ?? ?? CWO-ER-IRV(whole) ? CWO-ER-IRV(fractional) ? CWO-ranked pairs(WV) ? CWO-ranked ballot plurality ? minmax(pairwise opposition) with AERLO and ATLO ? beatpath(WV)with AERLO and ATLO ?