Method evaluation poll 2005
Method evalutaion poll
Please rate the following single-winner methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on merit alone. (That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate?)
The answers you give on your first pass through the survey need not be final. Please feel free to change/update your answers as many times as you like.
Feel free to add new methods, especially interesting ones!
binary input
JG CB ?? ?? ?? Plurality 2 2 Two round runoff 3 5 Approval 5 6 Random ballot 1 1
ranking input
not Condorcet-efficient
JG CB ?? ?? ?? Borda count 1 4 IRV without equal rankings 4 7 ER-IRV(whole) 6 4 ER-IRV(fractional) 6 6 Bucklin 3 6
nearly Condorcet-efficient
JG CB ?? ?? ?? minmax(pairwise opposition) 3 8 CDTT,IRV 7 9.5
Condorcet-efficient
JG CB ?? ?? ?? ranked pairs(WV) 8 7 ranked pairs(margins) 2 4 beatpath(WV) 8 7 beatpath(margins) 2 4 sequential dropping(WV) 7 ? minmax(WV) 3 ? minmax(margins) 1 ? Smith//minmax(WV) 7 ? Smith//minmax(margins) 2 ? Nanson 5 ? Raynaud 5 ?
ranking input with approval cutoff
JG CB ?? ?? ?? definite majority choice 7 8.5 approval weighted pairwise 9 8 approval margins 4 9
rating input
JG ?? ?? ?? ?? range voting (ratings summation) 6 ? median rating 3 ? ranked pairs(cardinal pairwise) 10 ? beatpath(cardinal pairwise) 10 ?
other
JG ?? ?? ?? ?? CWO-ER-IRV(whole) 7 ? CWO-ER-IRV(fractional) 7 ? CWO-ranked pairs(WV) 9 ? CWO-ranked ballot plurality 4 ? minmax(pairwise opposition) with AERLO and ATLO ? ? beatpath(WV) with AERLO and ATLO 8 ? beatpath(WV) with strong/weak preference option 8
See also
Essential questions poll