Proportional approval voting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Undo revision 2194 by 199.164.125.138 (talk) per suggestion on the Center for Election Science Discord server) Tag: Undo |
(Added some criterion pass/fails) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
The system disadvantages minority groups who share some preferences with the majority. In terms of [[tactical voting]], it is therefore highly desirable to withhold approval from candidates who are likely to be elected in any case, as with [[cumulative voting]] and the [[single non-transferable vote]]. |
The system disadvantages minority groups who share some preferences with the majority. In terms of [[tactical voting]], it is therefore highly desirable to withhold approval from candidates who are likely to be elected in any case, as with [[cumulative voting]] and the [[single non-transferable vote]]. |
||
PAV is strongly [[Monotonicity|monotonic]] and passes [[Independence of Irrelevant Ballots]]. However, it fails the [[Universally liked candidate criterion]] and also [[Perfect representation|Perfect Representation In the Limit]], which is arguably a prerequisite for an approval method to be considered properly proportional. |
|||
== Example == |
== Example == |
||