Tragni's method: Difference between revisions
Added variant Extended Tragni's method (E-TM)
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) (Added example) |
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) (Added variant Extended Tragni's method (E-TM)) |
||
Line 90:
Given the following vote: A[worst] B[1] C[2] D[3] E[4] F[5] G[best] the respective complete P Table is obtained:
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
|-
!
Line 493:
* eliminate all other candidates, normalizing the votes with Min-Max Normalization.
* of the two remaining candidates, the one who wins in the P head-to-head wins the election.
===Extended Tragni's method (E-TM)===
It's Tragni's method in which [best] and [worst] are divided into 3 semi-cardinal symbols and MAX = 3. The range options are:
[ 1w | 2w | 3w ] | 1 | 2 | 3 | [ 1b | 2b | 3b ]
The #w values will always be worst than the others. The #b values will always be best than the others. If two #w or #b values are to be considered, then they will be treated as cardinal values to make the proportion.
It offers a better representation of interests than Tragni's method, but it's more complex to understand how symbols work.
Example, given the following vote A[1w] B[2w] C[3w] D[1] E[2] F[3] G[1b] H[2b] I[3b], then this is the respective complete P Table:
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
|-
!
! A
! B
! C
! D
! E
! F
! G
! H
! I
|-
| A
|
| 1/2
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
|-
| B
| 2
|
| 2/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
|-
| C
| 3
| 3/2
|
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
|-
| D
| 3
| 3
| 3
|
| 1/2
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
|-
| E
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 2
|
| 2/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
|-
| F
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 3/2
|
| 1/3
| 1/3
| 1/3
|-
| G
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 3
|
| 1/2
| 1/3
|-
| H
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 2
|
| 2/3
|-
| I
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 3
| 3/2
|
|}
==Systems Comparison==
| |||