ABIF: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Linking to the other EM-list discussion |
Adding #Test case 9, per Jan Šimbera's suggestion on the EM-list |
||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
24:[蘇業]>DGM=AM>SBJ |
24:[蘇業]>DGM=AM>SBJ |
||
23:AM>[蘇業]>DGM>SBJ |
23:AM>[蘇業]>DGM>SBJ |
||
=== Test case 9 === |
|||
Asterisk-delimited multiplier (suggested by Jan Šimbera in May 2020: <ref>http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2021-June/002793.html</ref>) |
|||
[Doña García Márquez]: DGM |
|||
[Steven B. Jensen]: SBJ |
|||
[Sue Ye (蘇業)]: SY |
|||
[Adam Muñoz]: AM |
|||
27 * DGM/5, SBJ/2, SY/1, AM/0 |
|||
26 * DGM/3, SBJ/5, SY/3, AM/1 |
|||
24 * DGM/2, SBJ/1, SY/5, AM/2 |
|||
23 * DGM/1, SBJ/0, SY/3, AM/5 |
|||
== Footnotes == |
== Footnotes == |
Revision as of 02:03, 7 June 2021
ABIF stands for "aggregated ballot image format". As of May 2021, it has been undergoing discussion on the /r/EndFPTP subreddit and on the EM-list.[1][2][3][4]
Test cases
Test case 1
Unordered scores
12: Allie/5, Billy/5, Candace/4, Dennis/3, Edith/3, Frank/2, Georgie/1, Harold/0 7: Allie/4, Billy/0, Candace/2, Dennis/3, Edith/1, Frank/0, Georgie/5, Harold/3 5: Allie/0, Billy/3, Candace/2, Dennis/3, Edith/4, Frank/5, Georgie/3, Harold/4
( test case above copied from reddit post by /user/jman722 [3])
Test case 2
Ranked counterpart to #Test case 1.
12: Allie=Billy>Candace>Dennis=Edith>Frank>Georgie>Harold 7: Georgie>Allie>Dennis=Harold>Candace>Edith>Billy=Frank 5: Frank>Edith=Harold>Billy=Dennis=Georgie>Candace>Allie
Test case 3
Merged format to express both the range and the ordering:
12: Allie/5 =Billy/5 >Candace/4 >Dennis/3 =Edith/3 >Frank/2 >Georgie/1 >Harold/0 7: Georgie/5 >Allie/4 >Dennis/3 =Harold/3 >Candace/2 >Edith/1 >Billy/0 =Frank/0 5: Frank/5 >Edith/4 =Harold/4 >Billy/3 =Dennis/3 =Georgie/3 >Candace/2 >Allie/0
Test case 4
Bracketed candidate tokens (inlined). Unordered scores.
27: [Doña García Márquez]/5, [Steven B. Jensen]/2, [Sue Ye (蘇業)]/1, [Adam Muñoz]/0 26: [Doña García Márquez]/3, [Steven B. Jensen]/5, [Sue Ye (蘇業)]/3, [Adam Muñoz]/1 24: [Doña García Márquez]/2, [Steven B. Jensen]/1, [Sue Ye (蘇業)]/5, [Adam Muñoz]/2 23: [Doña García Márquez]/1, [Steven B. Jensen]/0, [Sue Ye (蘇業)]/3, [Adam Muñoz]/5
Test case 5
Bracketed candidate tokens (declared). Unordered scores.
[Doña García Márquez]: DGM [Steven B. Jensen]: SBJ [Sue Ye (蘇業)]: SY [Adam Muñoz]: AM 27: DGM/5, SBJ/2, SY/1, AM/0 26: DGM/3, SBJ/5, SY/3, AM/1 24: DGM/2, SBJ/1, SY/5, AM/2 23: DGM/1, SBJ/0, SY/3, AM/5
Test case 6
Bracketed candidate tokens (declared). Ranked and scored.
[Doña García Márquez]: DGM [Steven B. Jensen]: SBJ [Sue Ye (蘇業)]: SY [Adam Muñoz]: AM 27: DGM/5 > SBJ/2 > SY/1 > AM/0 26: SBJ/5 > DGM/3 = SY/3 > AM/1 24: SY/5 > DGM/2 = AM/2 > SBJ/1 23: AM/5 > SY/3 > DGM/1 > SBJ/0
Test case 7
Bracketed candidate tokens (declared). Ranked with no score.
[Doña García Márquez]: DGM [Steven B. Jensen]: SBJ [Sue Ye (蘇業)]: SY [Adam Muñoz]: AM 27: DGM > SBJ > SY > AM 26: SBJ > DGM = SY > AM 24: SY > DGM = AM > SBJ 23: AM > SY > DGM > SBJ
Test case 8
Bracketed candidate tokens (mixed). Ranked with no score. Most extra whitespace removed.
[Doña García Márquez]:DGM [Steven B. Jensen]:SBJ [Adam Muñoz]:AM 27:DGM>SBJ>[蘇業]>AM 26:SBJ>DGM=[蘇業]>AM 24:[蘇業]>DGM=AM>SBJ 23:AM>[蘇業]>DGM>SBJ
Test case 9
Asterisk-delimited multiplier (suggested by Jan Šimbera in May 2020: [5])
[Doña García Márquez]: DGM [Steven B. Jensen]: SBJ [Sue Ye (蘇業)]: SY [Adam Muñoz]: AM 27 * DGM/5, SBJ/2, SY/1, AM/0 26 * DGM/3, SBJ/5, SY/3, AM/1 24 * DGM/2, SBJ/1, SY/5, AM/2 23 * DGM/1, SBJ/0, SY/3, AM/5
Footnotes
- ↑ http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2021-May/002788.html
- ↑ https://www.reddit.com/r/EndFPTP/comments/nkm2cd/standardizing_cardinal_ballot_notation/gzls6pj/
- ↑ a b https://www.reddit.com/r/EndFPTP/comments/nkm2cd/standardizing_cardinal_ballot_notation/
- ↑ http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2021-May/002789.html
- ↑ http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2021-June/002793.html