Jump to content

Impartial culture: Difference between revisions

m
Fixed typo
mNo edit summary
m (Fixed typo)
Line 3:
This model is not particularly realistic, but it's mathematically easy to work with.
 
As the number of candidates approachapproaches infinity, the election becomes increasingly close to a perfect tie. Effects that depend on elections being tie-like in some way (like the lack of a Condorcet winner) will thus become increasingly frequent in many candidates under impartial culture. Tsetlin et al. found that impartial culture is the model that maximizes the chance of there being no Condorcet winner, consistent with this observation.<ref name="Tsetlin Regenwetter Grofman 2003 pp. 387–398">{{cite journal | last=Tsetlin | first=Ilia | last2=Regenwetter | first2=Michel | last3=Grofman | first3=Bernard | title=The impartial culture maximizes the probability of majority cycles | journal=Social Choice and Welfare | publisher=Springer | volume=21 | issue=3 | year=2003 | jstor=41106568 | pages=387–398 | url=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bernard-Grofman/publication/24064463_The_impartial_culture_maximizes_the_probability_of_majority_cycles/links/0fcfd51266f8e241fa000000/The-impartial-culture-maximizes-the-probability-of-majority-cycles.pdf | access-date=2022-03-26}}</ref>
 
{{stub}}
1,215

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.