Revision as of 14:16, 17 October 2012 (view source) 184.32.142.60 (talk) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:23, 17 October 2012 (view source) 184.32.142.60 (talk) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1: After this description and definition of Symmetrical ICT, I'll say a few words of what it implies for the compatibility of FBC and Condorcet's Criterion. Line 75 ⟶ 73: And that genuine legitimacy is the reason why Symmetrical ICT meets FBC (unlike traditional unimproved Condorcet). So: Improved Condorcet versions, including ICT and Symmetrical ICT, meet the ~~CondorcetCr~~Condorcet ~~iterion~~Criterion, when it is defined more legitmately. Likewise, then, it can be said that FBC and the Condorcet Criterion are compatible, contrary to popular belief. Though it's defined elsewhere in electowiki, under its own name, I'd like to state my definition of FBC here. This definition is ~~given~~also linked to at the FBC article in electowiki, as an alternative definition of FBC. But it's the FBC definition that I now prefer, and it's what I now mean when I say FBC.

Symmetrical ICT (view source)