4,211
edits
Talk:Vote unitarity: Difference between revisions
→The reason for the "Citation needed" tag: new section
(Let's take discussion about the "Advocacy" category over to User_talk:RobLa/Advocacy draft policy) |
(→The reason for the "Citation needed" tag: new section) |
||
Line 22:
:::: I'd suggest that "Advocacy" articles should allow for some form of counterargument or criticism to be mentioned somewhere. At the very least, allow at the bottom of the article for either a link to a separate electowiki article with the full criticisms, or allow the criticizers to link to a specific section of the Talk page for that article where they can present their arguments. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 01:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Yesterday, I created a draft advocacy policy ([[User:RobLa/Advocacy draft policy]]) with a slightly expanded version of the taxonomy above (in addition to "Not-quite-Wikipedia" and "Advocacy", the draft proposal now has a third category). Let's take discussion about the about the "Advocacy" category over to the talk page for the draft ([[User talk:RobLa/Advocacy draft policy]]), since we all agree that the "[[Vote unitarity]]" article doesn't read like an advocacy piece. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 01:14, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
== The reason for the "Citation needed" tag ==
[[User:Dr. Edmonds]], I put a "citation needed" tag in this article was for the sentence starting "He coined the term..." because I that seems to be a reasonably easy thing to cite (for someone who was part of the original conversation where the term was coined), yet there isn't a link. Could you provide a link to the forum post or other online conversation where you coined the term? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 01:24, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
| |||