Summability criterion: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(Created a formal-ish expression of the "summability criterion" that is hopefully understandable to typical voters (and is hopefully accurate))
(Removed incorrect definition, and wrote a first stab at a very high level summary. There may be some redundancy still.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{wikipedia|Summability criterion}}
{{wikipedia|Summability criterion}}
The '''summability criterion''' (sometimes referred to as "'''precinct summability'''" or "'''batch summability'''"<ref>{{Cite web |title=Q: Are STAR Voting ballots "summable," or do they require centralized tabulation? |url=https://www.starvoting.org/summable |access-date=2022-12-25 |website=STAR Voting |language=en}}</ref>) is a criterion about the vote-counting process of [[Electoral system|electoral systems]]. For batch summability to be true, the following must be true:
The '''summability criterion''' (sometimes referred to as "'''precinct summability'''" or "'''batch summability'''"<ref>{{Cite web |title=Q: Are STAR Voting ballots "summable," or do they require centralized tabulation? |url=https://www.starvoting.org/summable |access-date=2022-12-25 |website=STAR Voting |language=en}}</ref>) is a criterion about the vote-counting process of [[Electoral system|electoral systems]]. Summability concerns whether a method can be counted in precincts instead of having to be counted at a central location.


Informally, a method is summable if precinct ballots can be reduced to a small summary, and that the center can combine these small summaries to determine the outcome of the election as a whole. This both makes it easier to verify election results and reduces the amount of information that has to be transmitted to a centralized counting location.
*Say that candidates "A", "B", and "C" run against each other in an arbitrary election using single-winner electoral system "S"
*Say that candidate "A" wins in batch "X" (or precinct "X") when ballots are tabulated using single-winner electoral system "S"
*Say that candidate "A" wins in batch "Y" (or precinct "Y") when ballots are tabulated using single-winner electoral system "S"
*Therefore, candidate "A" must win when batches "X" and "Y" of ballots are tabulated using single-winner electoral system "S" for "S" to be "batch summable" (and thus, pass the "summability criterion")


Unlike most other voting system criteria, it does not relate to the end result, only to the process.
Unlike most other voting system criteria, it does not relate to the end result, only to the process.