Symmetrical ICT: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(doesn't satisfy FBC) |
(Linking to Mike Ossipoff) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{cleanup|reason=This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states an editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.}} |
{{cleanup|reason=This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states an editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.}} |
||
'''Symmetrical ICT''', short for '''Symmetrical Improved Condorcet, Top''' is a voting method designed by Michael Ossipoff. <!-- when? link to EM? --> It is based on Kevin Venzke's concept of "Improved Condorcet", which is a modification of pairwise comparison logic that enables methods to pass the [[favorite betrayal criterion]] at the cost of sometimes failing the [[Condorcet criterion]]. |
'''Symmetrical ICT''', short for '''Symmetrical Improved Condorcet, Top''' is a voting method designed by [[Mike Ossipoff|Michael Ossipoff]]. <!-- when? link to EM? --> It is based on Kevin Venzke's concept of "Improved Condorcet", which is a modification of pairwise comparison logic that enables methods to pass the [[favorite betrayal criterion]] at the cost of sometimes failing the [[Condorcet criterion]]. |
||
However, Symmetrical ICT doesn't actually pass the [[favorite betrayal criterion]]. |
However, Symmetrical ICT doesn't actually pass the [[favorite betrayal criterion]]. |
||