Talk:Center squeeze: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 14:46, 18 December 2023 (view source) Kristomun (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:10, 19 December 2023 (view source) RalphInOttawa (talk \| contribs) (→‎I need a different example.) Tag: Visual edit Newer edit →
Line 32:		Line 32:

	: Presumably, Center should also be elected if any of the candidates is cloned in a way that does not introduce a Condorcet cycle among the cloned candidates. This could exclude methods that check a fixed number of candidates to otherwise obtain Condorcet compliance, but it would also be more difficult to test. [[User:Kristomun\|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun\|talk]]) 14:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)		: Presumably, Center should also be elected if any of the candidates is cloned in a way that does not introduce a Condorcet cycle among the cloned candidates. This could exclude methods that check a fixed number of candidates to otherwise obtain Condorcet compliance, but it would also be more difficult to test. [[User:Kristomun\|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun\|talk]]) 14:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


			Good thinking. I will try more variations in the vote counts and comment on the results. Also, will have a look at your cloning scenario. Thanks for the feedback. [[User:RalphInOttawa\|RalphInOttawa]] ([[User talk:RalphInOttawa\|talk]]) 19:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)