Talk:Center squeeze: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Good thinking. I will try more variations in the vote counts and comment on the results. Also, will have a look at your cloning scenario. Thanks for the feedback. [[User:RalphInOttawa|RalphInOttawa]] ([[User talk:RalphInOttawa|talk]]) 19:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC) |
:: Good thinking. I will try more variations in the vote counts and comment on the results. Also, will have a look at your cloning scenario. Thanks for the feedback. [[User:RalphInOttawa|RalphInOttawa]] ([[User talk:RalphInOttawa|talk]]) 19:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
: I'm interested in a formal definition of a "center squeeze" criterion as well @RalphInOttawa. Some reasonable definitions: |
|||
:: 1. Candidates can fall outside of their region on a Yee diagram (my preference). |
|||
:: 2. Candidates may have an empty set on a Yee diagram. |
|||
:: 3. Satisfying the traditional definition of candidate-later-no-harm (i.e. later preferences have no impact on the election, so there's no consensus-seeking). |
|||
:: --[[User:Closed Limelike Curves|Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 21:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC) |