Talk:Condorcet paradox: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 C>B
+It's a paradox. It wasn't before, but it is now. And based on these votes, C deserves to be in the conversation. It's an election, the real focus should be on voting. All A needs to win is one more vote. Get 1 vote from B>A to become A>B, or 1 vote from C>B to become C>A>B. All A needs to do is prove they are better than the rest. That’s what voters want to see in an election.
-A still needs at least three voters to cast A>C for the tie. Voters have to wonder why A is so desperate as to ask.
-Why change your vote to get into a tie when you are ahead? All A needs to win is one more vote. Get 1 vote from B>A to become A>B, or 1 vote from C>B to become C>A>B. All you need is for your candidate to prove themselves better than the rest. That’s what voters want to see in an election.
 I think if you find a paradox, accept it as a tie. Give all the candidates the right incentive to go out and get their own votes.