Display title | Talk:Condorcet paradox |
Default sort key | Condorcet paradox |
Page length (in bytes) | 1,494 |
Namespace ID | 1 |
Namespace | Talk |
Page ID | 3892 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | RalphInOttawa (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 17:28, 14 December 2023 |
Latest editor | RalphInOttawa (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 05:29, 15 December 2023 |
Total number of edits | 13 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 13 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | We’ve seen it in IRV. Condorcet methods too. A close election brings out the worst in candidates and their election campaigns. |