| Display title | Talk:Consistency criterion |
| Default sort key | Consistency criterion |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,717 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 3920 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | Closed Limelike Curves (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 03:17, 8 February 2024 |
| Latest editor | Kristomun (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 16:23, 26 February 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 6 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 6 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 2 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | I can't see how participation and consistency are different. Participation says that adding extra votes that all rank A>B shouldn't cause the social choice function to switch from A>B to B>A. Consistency says adding the votes from a constituency with A>B shouldn't cause the function to switch from A>B to B>A. Unless we're not assuming Pareto, doesn't that mean consistency implies participation? Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 03:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC) |
