Talk:Distributed Score Voting: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6:
: Woodall states that DAC passes participation in his article "Monotonicity and Single-Seat Election Rules". [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 09:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, when I was evaluating the criteria I considered a counting method different from the written one. Now I have also fixed it in the wiki (it was a small change in point 3) so I will re-evaluate the various criteria.
In particular:
- participation criterion, consistency criterion, favorite betrayal criterion: you are right, they are not satisfied.
- IIA: this is particular because two candidates X and Y who aren't part of the Smith set are simply excluded (therefore the interests of the group on X with respect to Y aren't evaluated). The interests towards X and Y are evaluated only when they fall into the Smith set and in this case, it can be said that adding an irrelevant candidate, the interests of the group towards X and Y don't change.
| |||