Talk:First Past the Post electoral system: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 15:42, 28 November 2019

Possible norm for Wikipedia content on Electowiki

I nuked a large chunk of content, since I don't think it's valuable for us to spend a lot of time copyediting articles that were copied from Wikipedia to Electowiki back in 2005 or 2006. When there's already a sufficient article over on Wikipedia, we should just link to it summary style. I may note this later over on Electowiki:The caucus or on Electowiki:Policy -- RobLa (talk) 04:24, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

I agree with deleting this sort of duplicated content (as long as we check and make sure that each paragraphs/concepts really are duplicated in both places). — Psephomancy (talk) 15:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:24, 28 November 2019 (view source) RobLa (talk \| contribs) (Let's emulate the current FPTP article as how we link to Wikipedia (i.e. w:summary style))		Revision as of 15:42, 28 November 2019 (view source) Psephomancy (talk \| contribs) (reply to user:RobLa) Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I nuked a large chunk of content, since I don't think it's valuable for us to spend a lot of time copyediting articles that were copied from Wikipedia to Electowiki back in 2005 or 2006. When there's already a sufficient article over on Wikipedia, we should just link to it [[w:summary style\|summary style]]. I may note this later over on [[Electowiki:The caucus]] or on [[Electowiki:Policy]] -- [[User:RobLa\|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa\|talk]]) 04:24, 28 November 2019 (UTC)		I nuked a large chunk of content, since I don't think it's valuable for us to spend a lot of time copyediting articles that were copied from Wikipedia to Electowiki back in 2005 or 2006. When there's already a sufficient article over on Wikipedia, we should just link to it [[w:summary style\|summary style]]. I may note this later over on [[Electowiki:The caucus]] or on [[Electowiki:Policy]] -- [[User:RobLa\|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa\|talk]]) 04:24, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

			: I agree with deleting this sort of duplicated content (as long as we check and make sure that each paragraphs/concepts really are duplicated in both places). — [[User:Psephomancy\|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy\|talk]]) 15:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)