Talk:Monotonicity: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→We need a better example: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
(Is it still considered IRV? See the link on my user page). |
(Is it still considered IRV? See the link on my user page). |
||
[[User:RalphInOttawa|RalphInOttawa]] ([[User talk:RalphInOttawa|talk]]) 14:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
[[User:RalphInOttawa|RalphInOttawa]] ([[User talk:RalphInOttawa|talk]]) 14:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
: For a method to be monotone, there must be no monotonicity failures anywhere. Checking against an example only shows that there's no monotonicity failure there; there might still be others elsewhere. The only way to know would be by checking a large number of elections, e.g. by simulations, or being entirely certain by mathematical proof. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 14:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||