| Display title | Talk:Participation criterion |
| Default sort key | Participation criterion |
| Page length (in bytes) | 4,927 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 2408 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | Kristomun (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 11:12, 13 May 2020 |
| Latest editor | Closed Limelike Curves (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 04:17, 29 February 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 10 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 1 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | User:BetterVotingAdvocacy, the restricted version of Participation that you claim IRV and Condorcet fail, "A can't be harmed by adding a vote that bullet-votes for A", is called mono-add-plump. Here's a link that shows that at least one Condorcet method passes it: [1]. I think the Minmax-y ones also do (Schulze, RP, etc). IRV passes mono-add-top, which is a stronger (more general) version of mono-add-plump, and thus also passes mono-add-plump. I don't know about STAR, but you should probably find a source given that the other two claims were wrong. I've removed the section for now. Kristomun (talk) 11:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC) |
