| Display title | Talk:Single transferable vote |
| Default sort key | Single transferable vote |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,918 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 2390 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | Kristomun (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 09:38, 9 May 2020 |
| Latest editor | Doug (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 03:15, 4 July 2020 |
| Total number of edits | 6 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Transcluded template (1) | Template used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Woodall proposed one particular multiwinner extension of clone independence in paper 5 of issue 3 of Voting Matters,[1] because it's ambiguous how to generalize clone independence in a way that proportional systems pass. Still, STV does not pass all of Woodall's generalized clone criteria, so I'll remove the claim that STV does pass clone independence. |
