Talk:Strategy-free criterion: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Name???: new section) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is the discussion page (the "Talk:" page) for the page named "[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]". Please use this page to discuss the topic described in the corresponding page in the main namespace (i.e. the "[[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]" page here on electowiki), or visit [[Help:Talk]] to learn more about talk pages. |
|||
== Revision history / attribution == |
== Revision history / attribution == |
||
Article was originally on Wikipedia, but was deleted. Original revision history: |
Article was originally on Wikipedia, but was deleted. Original revision history: |
||
Line 24: | Line 26: | ||
* 04:28, November 5, 2004 . . McCart42 m (4,143 bytes) (added external link to electionmethods.org) |
* 04:28, November 5, 2004 . . McCart42 m (4,143 bytes) (added external link to electionmethods.org) |
||
* 04:02, November 5, 2004 . . McCart42 (3,937 bytes) (Began article - text taken with permission from http://www.electionmethods.org/evaluation.htm) |
* 04:02, November 5, 2004 . . McCart42 (3,937 bytes) (Began article - text taken with permission from http://www.electionmethods.org/evaluation.htm) |
||
{{collapse bottom}} |
{{collapse bottom}} -- {{Unsigned|Psephomancy|date=11:04, 3 February 2019}} |
||
⚫ | |||
Is there another name in the literature for this criterion? "Strategy-free criterion" seems like a term that's begging for a layperson to misinterpret it. -- {{Unsigned|Closed Limelike Curves|date=17:15, 3 February 2024}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
:{{ping|Closed Limelike Curves}} I have no idea what name may be used in the literature. This has been the name used on the [[election-methods mailing list]] for at least 20 years, and perhaps longer. It might be good to ask on the election-methods list and/or perhaps specifically ask [[Michael Ossipoff]] (who is currently active on the list). -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 09:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Please tell me there's another name somewhere in the literature for this criterion. "Strategy-free criterion" has got to be the worst possible way to describe this concept |
|||
:Will do, thanks! (Also, sorry if I was too harsh; reading that again, the tone came off very differently from how I intended.) --[[User:Closed Limelike Curves|Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 00:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:50, 15 February 2024
This is the discussion page (the "Talk:" page) for the page named "Strategy-free criterion". Please use this page to discuss the topic described in the corresponding page in the main namespace (i.e. the "Strategy-free criterion" page here on electowiki), or visit Help:Talk to learn more about talk pages.
Revision history / attribution
Article was originally on Wikipedia, but was deleted. Original revision history:
Revision history
|
---|
|
-- unsigned comment by Psephomancy - 11:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Name?
Is there another name in the literature for this criterion? "Strategy-free criterion" seems like a term that's begging for a layperson to misinterpret it. -- unsigned comment by Closed Limelike Curves - 17:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Closed Limelike Curves: I have no idea what name may be used in the literature. This has been the name used on the election-methods mailing list for at least 20 years, and perhaps longer. It might be good to ask on the election-methods list and/or perhaps specifically ask Michael Ossipoff (who is currently active on the list). -- RobLa (talk) 09:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Will do, thanks! (Also, sorry if I was too harsh; reading that again, the tone came off very differently from how I intended.) --Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 00:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC)