Talk:Vote unitarity: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]], could we move this article into your userspace? This seems like a concept that hasn't yet been thoroughly vetted. Alternatively, we can use this as an example to try out the banner idea that [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] suggested over on [[Electowiki_talk:The_caucus]], but my bias would be to see a discussion of this topic out on the [[election-methods mailing list]] before trying to prematurely codify the consensus here. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 01:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]], could we move this article into your userspace? This seems like a concept that hasn't yet been thoroughly vetted. Alternatively, we can use this as an example to try out the banner idea that [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] suggested over on [[Electowiki_talk:The_caucus]], but my bias would be to see a discussion of this topic out on the [[election-methods mailing list]] before trying to prematurely codify the consensus here. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 01:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
: [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] Why do you believe it is not vetted? I do not see why something needs to be rediscussed on your mailing list before it can be posted here. I thought the point of this whole wiki was to have more recent developments than wikipedia. I am fine with the banner but there are dozens of other pages like this. There is no reason to single out this page. The committee founded around developing these ideas needs a place to record results for public consumption. If this is not the place for that then it should be decided before we invest more time. --[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]] ([[User talk:Dr. Edmonds|talk]]) 02:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:33, 17 December 2019

Possibly moving this article to "User:Dr._Edmonds/Vote_Unitarity"

Dr. Edmonds, could we move this article into your userspace? This seems like a concept that hasn't yet been thoroughly vetted. Alternatively, we can use this as an example to try out the banner idea that Psephomancy suggested over on Electowiki_talk:The_caucus, but my bias would be to see a discussion of this topic out on the election-methods mailing list before trying to prematurely codify the consensus here. -- RobLa (talk) 01:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

RobLa Why do you believe it is not vetted? I do not see why something needs to be rediscussed on your mailing list before it can be posted here. I thought the point of this whole wiki was to have more recent developments than wikipedia. I am fine with the banner but there are dozens of other pages like this. There is no reason to single out this page. The committee founded around developing these ideas needs a place to record results for public consumption. If this is not the place for that then it should be decided before we invest more time. --Dr. Edmonds (talk) 02:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)