Talk:Voting theorist: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) |
(→Potentials to add: - What sort of non-electowiki source would we use to decide whether someone is notable enough for a page?) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
:::: [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] How about we use the requirement that they are an inventor/developer of something which is itself worthy of a page? This implies that they have contributed to the field and are not just well versed in the field. Is that a reasonable criteria for notability? I do not think that being on this list should imply that they are notable enough for their own page. --[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]] ([[User talk:Dr. Edmonds|talk]]) 07:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC) |
:::: [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] How about we use the requirement that they are an inventor/developer of something which is itself worthy of a page? This implies that they have contributed to the field and are not just well versed in the field. Is that a reasonable criteria for notability? I do not think that being on this list should imply that they are notable enough for their own page. --[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]] ([[User talk:Dr. Edmonds|talk]]) 07:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
::::: [[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]], that's infinitely recursive naval gazing, isn't it? What sort of ''non-electowiki'' source would we use to decide whether someone is notable enough to be highlighted as an "electoral theorist" (with their own page)? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 21:44, 7 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||