User:RobLa/Woodall-to-RobLa
Quoting an email sent to the EM list in November 2020[1]
- mono-raise - dont-muck-with-ballots-criterion ("Monotonicity (Classic)")
- mono-raise-delete - participation-criterion ("Monotonicity (Nuke ballots)")
- mono-raise-random - adding-random-ballots-causes-mayhem-criterion ("Monotonicity (Add random)")
- mono-append - fill-in-ballot-bubbles-criterion ("Monotonicity (Add preference)")
- mono-sub-plump - replace-ballots-criterion ("Monotonicity (Erase preference)")
- mono-sub-top - replace-with-new-winner-criterion ("Monotonicity ()")
- mono-add-plump - add-incompletely-ranked-ballots-to-cause-loss-criterion ("Monotonicity (Add incomplete ballots)")
- mono-add-top - add-top-scored-but-mostly-random-criterion ("Monotonicity (Add mostly random)")
- mono-remove-bottom - remove-bottom-ranked-Condorcet-loser-ballots-criterion ("Monotonicity (Remove Condorcet loser haters)")
Footnotes
- ↑ Message: "[EM] Re: What is the most useful definition of "monotonicity"?" -- Rob Lanphier in response to Toby Pereira - November 17, 2020 (Thread: http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2020-November/thread.html#2593)