User talk:Kristomun: Difference between revisions
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) →Welcome!: new section |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) →Category:Consensus multiwinner methods: new section |
||
Line 10:
The wiki is 14 years old and has never had a ton of activity, so the goals/policies were never really solidified. Your input is welcome, especially on how to handle the separation of biased advocacy from neutral informative content (which are both welcome). See [[Electowiki:The caucus]] for the discussion topics and [[Electowiki:Policy]]. — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 18:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
== [[Category:Consensus multiwinner methods]] ==
Does this mean they try to elect a bunch of utilitiarian winners instead of PR? — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 04:32, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 04:32, 7 February 2020
Welcome!
Hi,
Welcome to the new Electowiki! See User:RobLa and Electowiki:About for notes about the migration.
Let me know on my talk page if there's anything I can help with, if you know of any deleted articles on Wikipedia that could be resurrected here, etc. There's a To do list if you're looking for something to help with.
This runs on Mediawiki, so it has a lot of the same features as Wikipedia, but is missing a few (like automatic citation generation) and has a few that Wikipedia doesn't (like support for inline YouTube videos). Images from Wikimedia Commons can be used directly without needing to be uploaded. Templates can also be transcluded from other wikis, though it's better to export and import them.
The wiki is 14 years old and has never had a ton of activity, so the goals/policies were never really solidified. Your input is welcome, especially on how to handle the separation of biased advocacy from neutral informative content (which are both welcome). See Electowiki:The caucus for the discussion topics and Electowiki:Policy. — Psephomancy (talk) 18:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Does this mean they try to elect a bunch of utilitiarian winners instead of PR? — Psephomancy (talk) 04:32, 7 February 2020 (UTC)