User talk:RobLa/MAF: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Put in links to the email discussions, and added a comment at the bottom about the current state of the discussion.) |
m (RobLa moved page User talk:RobLa/Approval-based primary election methods to User talk:RobLa/MAF: Reshuffling User:RobLa/MAF and User:RobLa/MATT pages) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== 2018 email discussions about MAF == |
== 2018 email discussions about MAF == |
||
* December 2018: [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2018-December/thread.html December continuation of November's "Approval-based replacement for jungle primary" thread] |
|||
* November 2018: [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2018-November/001922.html Approval-based replacement for jungle primary] ([http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2018-November/thread.html#1922 November thread]) |
* November 2018: [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2018-November/001922.html Approval-based replacement for jungle primary] ([http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2018-November/thread.html#1922 November thread]) |
||
* July 2018: [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2018-July/001844.html "EM - A simpler approval based way of replacing the CA jungle primary]" ([http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2018-July/thread.html#1844 July thread], [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2018-August/thread.html#1886 August thread]) |
* July 2018: [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2018-July/001844.html "EM - A simpler approval based way of replacing the CA jungle primary]" ([http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2018-July/thread.html#1844 July thread], [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2018-August/thread.html#1886 August thread]) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
The November email discussion is likely to lead to a major revision of MAF. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 21:38, 22 November 2018 (UTC) |
The November email discussion is likely to lead to a major revision of MAF. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 21:38, 22 November 2018 (UTC) |
||
: The November and December email discussions did lead to a major revision of MAF, which I've published here today. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 23:30, 7 December 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Draft 4 == |
|||
Changes in upcoming Draft 4: |
|||
<blockquote> |
|||
# (unchanged) |
|||
# (unchanged) |
|||
# (unchanged) |
|||
#If there is one or more candidates in the Plurality Candidate Pool, attempt to add an equal number qualified candidates to the Opposition Candidate Pool, evaluating each Non-advanced Candidate using the following steps |
|||
#*4a. Find the Non-advanced Candidate with the highest approval score. |
|||
#**<s>If this candidate has less than 40% approval, no further candidates qualify to be added to the Opposition Candidate Pool. Proceed to step 5.</s> |
|||
#**If this candidate has less than 40% approval, determine if this candidate qualifies for the Opposition Candidate Pool in step 5. |
|||
#*4b. (unchanged) |
|||
# If the Ballot Satisfaction Score is greater than 50%, skip to step 6. If the Ballot Satisfaction Score is under 50%, ensure at least two candidates advance to the general election using the following steps: |
|||
#*5a. If there are no candidates in the Opposition Candidate Pool, find the Non-advanced Candidate with the highest approval score. If this candidate increases the Ballot Satisfaction Score by more than 10% (the "Candidate Differentiation Threshold"), add this candidate to the Opposition Candidate Pool, and skip to step 6. Otherwise, advanced to step 5b. |
|||
#*5b. Consider each Non-advanced Candidate in order of approval score. Find the first candidate who increases the Ballot Satisfaction Score by more than the Candidate Differentiation Threshold (10%), and add this candidate to the Opposition Candidate Pool, and skip to step 6. Otherwise, advance to step 5c. |
|||
#*5c. Find the Non-advanced Candidate with the highest approval rating. Add this candidate to the Opposition Candidate Pool, and advance to step 6. |
|||
# Candidate selection is complete. Advance all candidates in the Supermajority Candidate Pool, the Plurality Candidate Pool, and the Opposition Candidate Pool to the general election. |
|||
</blockquote> |
|||
---- |
|||
I've started Draft 4 with [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2018-December/001949.html this 2018-12-19 response to Ted Stern], which are reflected in the changes above. There may be other changes before a Draft 4 is published, and I plan to use the space above to reflect the the changes I make. -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 23:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 01:38, 1 May 2022
2018 email discussions about MAF
- December 2018: December continuation of November's "Approval-based replacement for jungle primary" thread
- November 2018: Approval-based replacement for jungle primary (November thread)
- July 2018: "EM - A simpler approval based way of replacing the CA jungle primary" (July thread, August thread)
- February 2018: EM - Party-based top two with approval (March discussion thread)
The November email discussion is likely to lead to a major revision of MAF. -- RobLa (talk) 21:38, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- The November and December email discussions did lead to a major revision of MAF, which I've published here today. -- RobLa (talk) 23:30, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Draft 4
Changes in upcoming Draft 4:
- (unchanged)
- (unchanged)
- (unchanged)
- If there is one or more candidates in the Plurality Candidate Pool, attempt to add an equal number qualified candidates to the Opposition Candidate Pool, evaluating each Non-advanced Candidate using the following steps
- 4a. Find the Non-advanced Candidate with the highest approval score.
If this candidate has less than 40% approval, no further candidates qualify to be added to the Opposition Candidate Pool. Proceed to step 5.- If this candidate has less than 40% approval, determine if this candidate qualifies for the Opposition Candidate Pool in step 5.
- 4b. (unchanged)
- If the Ballot Satisfaction Score is greater than 50%, skip to step 6. If the Ballot Satisfaction Score is under 50%, ensure at least two candidates advance to the general election using the following steps:
- 5a. If there are no candidates in the Opposition Candidate Pool, find the Non-advanced Candidate with the highest approval score. If this candidate increases the Ballot Satisfaction Score by more than 10% (the "Candidate Differentiation Threshold"), add this candidate to the Opposition Candidate Pool, and skip to step 6. Otherwise, advanced to step 5b.
- 5b. Consider each Non-advanced Candidate in order of approval score. Find the first candidate who increases the Ballot Satisfaction Score by more than the Candidate Differentiation Threshold (10%), and add this candidate to the Opposition Candidate Pool, and skip to step 6. Otherwise, advance to step 5c.
- 5c. Find the Non-advanced Candidate with the highest approval rating. Add this candidate to the Opposition Candidate Pool, and advance to step 6.
- Candidate selection is complete. Advance all candidates in the Supermajority Candidate Pool, the Plurality Candidate Pool, and the Opposition Candidate Pool to the general election.
I've started Draft 4 with this 2018-12-19 response to Ted Stern, which are reflected in the changes above. There may be other changes before a Draft 4 is published, and I plan to use the space above to reflect the the changes I make. -- RobLa (talk) 23:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)