Category:Favorite betrayal criterion
For categories please use the templates available at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.
The Favorite Betrayal criterion is a criterion for evaluating voting systems.
Current Definition of FBC:[edit | edit source]
The voting system must allow the voter to vote at top as many candidates as s/he wishes.
If the winner is a candidate who is top-voted by you, then moving an additional candidate to top on your ballot shouldn't change the winner to a candidate who is not then top-voted by you.
A candidate is "top-voted" by you, and is "at top" on your ballot, if you don't vote anyone over him/her.
The definiton written below is the one that FBC's initial propponent had originally written and used. Its problem was that it led to the question of "What if the way of voting that optimizes your outcome without favorite-burial is some complicated, difficult-to-find strategy?". That question led to a better definition, written above on this page. Some time ago, someone else, too, had written that definition, and a link to it is given at the bottom of this page, under a different name (Sincere Favorite Criterion).
The above part of this page was added by Michael Ossipoff
Earlier Definition[edit | edit source]
A voter optimizes the outcome (from his/her own perspective) if his vote causes the election of the best possible candidate that can be elected, based on his own preferences, given all the votes cast by other voters.
Earlier FBC definition:
For any voter who has a unique favorite, there should be no possible set of votes cast by the other voters such that the voter can optimize the outcome (from his own perspective) only by voting someone over his favorite.
Complying methods[edit | edit source]
Approval voting, range voting, Majority Judgment, MinMax(pairwise opposition), MCA (except MCA-A and some versions of MCA-R), MAMPO, and Improved Condorcet Approval comply with the favorite betrayal criterion, as do ICT and Symmetrical ICT.
Borda count, plurality voting, Condorcet methods (except for Improved Condorcet methdods, such as Kevin Venzke's ICA, and Chris Benham's ICT, and Symmetrical ICT) and instant-runoff voting do not comply.
Commentary[edit | edit source]
Election methods that meet this criterion provide no incentive for voters to betray their favorite candidate by voting another candidate over him or her.
An interpretation of this criterion applied to votes as cast is the Sincere Favorite criterion.
Some parts of this article are derived with permission from text at http://electionmethods.org
|This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).|
Voting systems which do not comply with this criterion:[edit | edit source]
Voting systems which comply with this criterion[edit | edit source]
Pages in category "Favorite betrayal criterion"
This category contains only the following page.