| Display title | Effects of different voting systems under similar circumstances |
| Default sort key | Effects of different voting systems under similar circumstances |
| Page length (in bytes) | 33,662 |
| Namespace ID | 0 |
| Page ID | 144 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | imported>RobLa |
| Date of page creation | 06:59, 7 March 2010 |
| Latest editor | RobLa (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 03:40, 13 September 2023 |
| Total number of edits | 8 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Transcluded templates (3) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | This article describes what is sometimes referred to as the "Tennessee example". It describes an example election using geographical proximity to create hypothetical preferences of a group of voters, and then compares the results of such preferences with ten different voting systems. It does not, however, address any of the voting systems that are based on proportional representation. |
