| Display title | Independence of clone alternatives |
| Default sort key | Independence of clone alternatives |
| Page length (in bytes) | 36,270 |
| Namespace ID | 0 |
| Page ID | 204 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 7 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | imported>Homunq |
| Date of page creation | 17:06, 27 October 2016 |
| Latest editor | Kristomun (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 16:34, 21 August 2023 |
| Total number of edits | 21 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | In voting systems theory, the independence of clones criterion measures an election method's robustness to strategic nomination. Nicolaus Tideman was the first to formulate this criterion, which states that the winner must not change due to the addition of a non-winning candidate who is similar to a candidate already present.[1] |
