Independence of clone alternatives: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Added STAR voting info from links and cleaned up cardinal vs ordinal controversy parts.) |
m (Changed clone set ambiguity example slightly to emphasize the point.) |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
{{ballots| |
{{ballots| |
||
1: A>B>C |
|||
1: C>B>A}} |
|||
It's possible that this is an election where candidate A was cloned and the clone set is A and B, but it's also possible that candidate B was cloned and the clone set is B and C. |
It's possible that this is an election where candidate A was cloned and the clone set is A and B, but it's also possible that candidate B was cloned and the clone set is B and C. |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
{{ballots| |
{{ballots| |
||
1: A>B |
|||
1: B>A |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
{{ballots| |
{{ballots| |
||
1: A>C |
|||
1: C>A |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
to the election above. This example can be used to show that [[Random ballot]] is cloneproof while [[Random Pair]] is not. |
|||
to the election above. |
|||
== Compliant methods == |
== Compliant methods == |
||