| Display title | Mutual majority criterion |
| Default sort key | Mutual majority criterion |
| Page length (in bytes) | 13,408 |
| Namespace ID | 0 |
| Page ID | 291 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 4 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Page views in the past month | 8 |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | imported>DanKeshet |
| Date of page creation | 06:56, 16 March 2005 |
| Latest editor | AstroAnarchist (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 01:11, 10 May 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 36 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The mutual majority criterion is a criterion for evaluating voting systems. Most simply, it can be thought of as requiring that whenever a majority of voters prefer a set of candidates (often candidates from the same political party) above all others (i.e. when choosing among ice cream flavors, a majority of voters are split between several variants of chocolate ice cream, but agree that any of the chocolate-type flavors are better than any of the other ice cream flavors), someone from that set must win (i.e. one of the chocolate-type flavors must win). It is the single-winner case of Droop-Proportionality for Solid Coalitions. |
