Proportional representation: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* [[South America]]: [[Argentina]], [[Brazil]], |
* [[South America]]: [[Argentina]], [[Brazil]], |
||
Countries which have semi-proportional representation systems include: [[Australia]], [[Germany]], [[Hungary]], [[India]], [[Republic of Ireland]], [[Italy]], [[Japan]], [[Mexico]], [[New Zealand]], [[Thailand]] and [[Wales]]. India is |
Countries which have semi-proportional representation systems include: [[Australia]], [[Germany]], [[Hungary]], [[India]], [[Republic of Ireland]], [[Italy]], [[Japan]], [[Mexico]], [[New Zealand]], [[Thailand]] and [[Wales]]. [[India]] is perhaps the largest democracy which uses a form of proportional representation. |
||
Similar principles apply to sub-regions, who may have their own parliament or assembly. For example, in [[W:Scotland|Scotland]], after the passage of the [[W:Local Governance (Scotland) Act 2004|Local Governance (Scotland) Act 2004]], the Scottish portion of the [[United Kingdom]] uses [[single transferable vote]] to select many of their local representatives. |
Similar principles apply to sub-regions, who may have their own parliament or assembly. For example, in [[W:Scotland|Scotland]], after the passage of the [[W:Local Governance (Scotland) Act 2004|Local Governance (Scotland) Act 2004]], the Scottish portion of the [[United Kingdom]] uses [[single transferable vote]] to select many of their local representatives. |