Sainte-Laguë method: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
(Improve reference) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Notes == |
== Notes == |
||
Webster, unlike D'Hondt, doesn't guarantee that a majority of voters will get at least half of the seats.<ref>{{ |
Webster, unlike D'Hondt, doesn't guarantee that a majority of voters will get at least half of the seats.<ref name="Miller pp. 4–25">{{cite journal | last=Miller | first=Nicholas R. | title=Election Inversions under Proportional Representation | journal=Scandinavian Political Studies | publisher=Wiley | volume=38 | issue=1 | date=2014-12-05 | issn=0080-6757 | doi=10.1111/1467-9477.12038 | pages=4–25|url=https://userpages.umbc.edu/~nmiller/RESEARCH/NRMILLER.PCS2013.pdf|access-date=2020-03-24}}</ref> |
||
UNDER PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION|last=|first=|date=|website=|page=16|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref> |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|+35-seat example |
|+35-seat example |
||
| Line 62: | Line 61: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
If D'Hondt had been used, the final divisor would've been 27.944, with (results calculated by rounding down to the nearest number) Party A getting 18 seats out of 35, a 51.42% majority (503/27.944), B 10 seats (304/27.944), and C 6 seats. |
If D'Hondt had been used, the final divisor would've been 27.944, with (results calculated by rounding down to the nearest number) Party A getting 18 seats out of 35, a 51.42% majority (503/27.944), B 10 seats (304/27.944), and C 6 seats. |
||
== References == |
|||
<references /> |
|||
[[Category:Party list theory]] |
[[Category:Party list theory]] |
||