4,208
edits
Talk:Voting theorist: Difference between revisions
→Potentials to add: - I'm fine with being more inclusive, but do we have an objective means of rejecting people from the list?
m (RobLa moved page Talk:Voting theorists to Talk:Voting theorist: Pages are singular, and categories are plural) |
(→Potentials to add: - I'm fine with being more inclusive, but do we have an objective means of rejecting people from the list?) |
||
Line 1:
{{TalkPageIntro}}
* [[Michel Balinski]]
Line 25 ⟶ 26:
:: I think it would be a good idea to add all the above. This is not a field with any way to accredit people so it may be best to list as many people as possible. Any thoughts, [[User:RobLa|RobLa]]? --[[User:Dr. Edmonds|Dr. Edmonds]] ([[User talk:Dr. Edmonds|talk]]) 18:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
::: I'm okay with being more generous than [[English Wikipedia]] when it comes to notability, and I'm okay with this list. As you might have seen, we didn't (yet) have a page for [[Kenneth Arrow]] before today. Now we do. I'm not sure how we qualify people to go on the list, other than "''this person seems to know what they are talking about''". Do we have an objective means of rejecting people from the list? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]])
| |||