Jump to content

Talk:Condorcet paradox: Difference between revisions

Line 12:
 
If the 11 supporters of A really had a second choice and it was B or C using IRV… same result.
However, IRV would elect A if 3 supporters moved over to C (voter betrayal to succeed). Obviously, facing defeat, A has every reason to try, but supporters of A may not. Rather than do that calculated 3 vote move to make a tie, voters should be able to simply vote for a 3 way tie without betraying anyone they voted for.
I recommend that it deserves nothing more than be a 3 way tie. Obviously, facing defeat, A has every reason to try, but supporters of A may not. But maybe they will play. Rather than do that calculated 3 vote move to make a tie, voters should be able to simply vote for a 3 way tie without betraying anyone they voted for.
 
11 A>C
Line 21 ⟶ 20:
5 C>B
 
YouA still needneeds at least three voters to cast A>C to getfor the tie. Voters have to wonder why youA areis so desperate as to ask.
 
Why change your vote to get into a tie when you are ahead? All A needs to win is one more vote. Get 1 vote from B>A to become A>B, or 1 vote from C>B to become C>A>B. All you need is for your candidate to prove yourselfthemselves better than the rest. That’s what voters want to see in an election.
 
I think if you find a paradox, accept it as a tie. Give all the candidates the right incentive to go out and get their own votes.
143

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.