Jump to content

Talk:Condorcet paradox: Difference between revisions

Talk:Condorcet paradox (view source)

Revision as of 02:22, 15 December 2023

28 bytes removed ,  6 months ago
→‎Why a tie must be a tie in politics
VisualWikitext
Line 20:
5 C>B
 
WhyIt's changea yourparadox. voteIt wasn't before, but it is now. And based on these votes, C deserves to getbe intoin athe tieconversation. whenIt's youan areelection, ahead?the real focus should be on voting. All A needs to win is one more vote. Get 1 vote from B>A to become A>B, or 1 vote from C>B to become C>A>B. All youA needneeds isto fordo your candidate tois prove themselvesthey are better than the rest. That’s what voters want to see in an election.▼
A still needs at least three voters to cast A>C for the tie. Voters have to wonder why A is so desperate as to ask.
 
▲Why change your vote to get into a tie when you are ahead? All A needs to win is one more vote. Get 1 vote from B>A to become A>B, or 1 vote from C>B to become C>A>B. All you need is for your candidate to prove themselves better than the rest. That’s what voters want to see in an election.
 
I think if you find a paradox, accept it as a tie. Give all the candidates the right incentive to go out and get their own votes.
RalphInOttawa
143

edits

Retrieved from "https://electowiki.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/17852"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
More information