Jump to content

Talk:Condorcet paradox: Difference between revisions

Line 12:
 
If the 11 supporters of A really had a second choice and it was B or C using IRV… same result.
However, IRV would elect A if 3 supporters moved over to C (voter betrayal to succeed). Obviously, facing defeat, A has every reason to try, but supporters of A may not. Rather than do that calculated 3 vote move to make a tie, voterssupporters of A should beonly need to change 3 of their ablevotes to simplyA>C. voteThat formakes athe 3 way tie without betraying anyone they voted for.
 
118 A>C
 
3 A>C
 
7 B>A
Line 20 ⟶ 22:
5 C>B
 
It's a paradox. It wasn't before, but it is now. And based on these votes, C deserves to be in the conversation. It's an election, theThe real focus should be on voting. All A needs to win is one more vote. Get 1 vote from B>A to become A>B, or 1 vote from C>B to become C>A>B. AllCandidates A needsneed to do is prove they are better than the rest. That’s what voters want to see in an election.
 
I think if you find a paradox, accept it as a tie. Give all the candidates the right incentive to go out and get their own votes.
143

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.