Jump to content

Talk:Instant-runoff voting: Difference between revisions

m
Line 296:
== Re: Assessing IRV, the advantages of normal runoff voting over IRV. ==
 
My suggested improvement to IRV, [[user:RalphInOttawa/Standard Vote]], has that CHANCE FOR APPEAL, (an advantage of normal runoff voting over IRV) in that the supporters of the first instant runoff’s runner-up are essentially given this opportunity with a second instant runoff. And the supporters of the first runoff winner get the same deal with a third instant runoff if they need it. The campaigning by opinion poll leaders would remain MORE POSITIVE because the voter’s order of preference can’t be changed between the instant runoffs. There is no forgiving and forgetting over what was said during a negative campaign.
 
[[User:RalphInOttawa|RalphInOttawa]] ([[User talk:RalphInOttawa|talk]]) 08:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
143

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.