4,211
edits
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (formatting, wording, links) |
(→Tennessee capital (center squeeze): Using Template:Tenn voting example instead of the English Wikipedia version.) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 23:
=== Delegated 3-2-1 ===
In this method, each candidate can pre-rate other candidates "OK", "conditionally OK", or "bad". If they do not explicitly pre-rate, they are considered to pre-rate all others "conditionally OK". Once all pre-ratings have been submitted, all "conditionally OK" pre-ratings are turned to "Bad" if the pre-rating coming from the other
When a voter leaves a candidate X blank/unrated, and rates exactly one other candidate Y as "Good", that counts as rating X as "OK" if Y pre-rated X "OK". Otherwise, it counts as rating X "Bad". Implicit OKs in this sense are counted as lower than explicit OKs in
For example, if I rated only Aurelio "good" and left Beth and Chung blank; and Aurelio pre-rated Beth as "OK" and Chung as "Bad", then I'd count as giving those ratings. If I'd also rated
=== Undelegated 3-2-1 ===
Line 47:
=== Tennessee capital (center squeeze) ===
{{Tenn voting example}}
This leads to the following outcome:
Line 193:
[[Category:Single-winner voting methods]]
[[Category:Runoff-based voting methods]]
[[Category:Cardinal voting methods]]
{{fromelectorama}}
|