| Display title | Talk:Advocacy |
| Default sort key | Advocacy |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,496 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 2268 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 1 (0 redirects; 1 non-redirect) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | RobLa (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 20:53, 19 April 2020 |
| Latest editor | RobLa (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 17:22, 30 June 2020 |
| Total number of edits | 3 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | I've been thinking about both how MediaWiki works, as well as how other wikis work as I've been structuring the Activism section (which, as you can see from the discussion over at Category_talk:Advocacy, could get renamed to "Advocacy"). My current bias is to build out a set of Activism/* subpages (e.g. Activism/Canada, Activism/United States, Activism/Mexico, Activism/California, Activism/Oregon) where the page name is prefixed by "Activism", and then we get to use MediaWiki's subpage functionality to get automatic navigation back to the parent Activism page. However, I'm a little unsure about how pedantic we want to be about maintaining a strict hierarchy (e.g., having Activism/North America/United States/Pacific/California instead of Activism/California. My bias there would be to keep it simple (and just have Activism/California. Thoughts? -- RobLa (talk) 20:52, 19 April 2020 (UTC) |
