Talk:Condorcet paradox: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
But, why do this? Why add an insincere preference, if all you get is a tie? Don’t ask your supporters to do that. |
But, why do this? Why add an insincere preference, if all you get is a tie? Don’t ask your supporters to do that. |
||
Why change your vote to get into a tie when you are ahead? All A needs to win is one more vote. Get 1 vote from B>A to become |
Why change your vote to get into a tie when you are ahead? All A needs to win is one more vote. Get 1 vote from B>A to become A>B, or 1 vote from C>B to become C>A>B. All you need is to prove yourself better than the rest. That’s what voters want to see in an election. |
||
I think if you find a paradox, accept it as a tie. Give all the candidates the right incentive to go out and get their own votes. |
I think if you find a paradox, accept it as a tie. Give all the candidates the right incentive to go out and get their own votes. |