Talk:Condorcet paradox: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Why a tie must be a tie in politics: new section) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
I recommend that it deserves nothing more than be a 3 way tie. Obviously, facing defeat, A has every reason to try, but supporters of A may not. The question to them is “Why cast an insincere vote, if all you get is a 3 way tie? If there was nothing wrong with electing B. Let it go. |
I recommend that it deserves nothing more than be a 3 way tie. Obviously, facing defeat, A has every reason to try, but supporters of A may not. The question to them is “Why cast an insincere vote, if all you get is a 3 way tie? If there was nothing wrong with electing B. Let it go. |
||
But if they do want to play. Rather than do that calculated 3 vote move to make a tie, voters |
But if they do want to play. Rather than do that calculated 3 vote move to make a tie, voters should be able to simply vote for a 3 way tie without betraying anyone they voted for. |
||
11 A>C |
11 A>C |
||