Talk:Condorcet winner criterion: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (RobLa moved page Talk:Condorcet criterion to Talk:Condorcet winner criterion: pairing with w:Condorcet winner criterion) |
(→Social utility efficiency: new section) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:: I can't seem to find a source saying indifference counts in favor of both, so I've changed the phrasing. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 14:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC) |
:: I can't seem to find a source saying indifference counts in favor of both, so I've changed the phrasing. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 14:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Social utility efficiency == |
|||
Some of Colin Champion's work might be relevant to show that Condorcet can produce high efficiencies, but is still bounded away from maximum efficiency. E.g. "Better than Condorcet?" on EM, 2022-02-01, does this for a contrived mixture model. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 12:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||