Talk:Condorcet winner criterion: Revision history

16 April 2024

• curprev 12:1112:11, 16 April 2024‎ Kristomun talk contribs‎ 3,750 bytes +364‎ →‎Social utility efficiency: new section

26 June 2021

• curprev 00:2000:20, 26 June 2021‎ RobLa talk contribs‎ m 3,386 bytes 0‎ RobLa moved page Talk:Condorcet criterion to Talk:Condorcet winner criterion: pairing with w:Condorcet winner criterion

24 March 2020

• curprev 14:4914:49, 24 March 2020‎ Kristomun talk contribs‎ m 3,386 bytes +22‎ No edit summary
• curprev 14:4514:45, 24 March 2020‎ Kristomun talk contribs‎ 3,364 bytes +196‎ No edit summary

19 March 2020

• curprev 03:0803:08, 19 March 2020‎ BetterVotingAdvocacy talk contribs‎ 3,168 bytes +794‎ No edit summary

27 February 2020

• curprev 19:2619:26, 27 February 2020‎ BetterVotingAdvocacy talk contribs‎ 2,374 bytes +310‎ →‎Smith set with two members

6 January 2020

• curprev 00:2100:21, 6 January 2020‎ Psephomancy talk contribs‎ 2,064 bytes +195‎ reply to User:RobLa

5 January 2020

• curprev 23:5123:51, 5 January 2020‎ RobLa talk contribs‎ 1,869 bytes +906‎ hmm...looks like I was wrong about the Smith set. btw, where is "weak Condorcet winner" defined?
• curprev 06:2306:23, 5 January 2020‎ Psephomancy talk contribs‎ 963 bytes +145‎ respond to User:RobLa
• curprev 04:3204:32, 5 January 2020‎ RobLa talk contribs‎ 818 bytes +464‎ →‎Smith set with two members: can't have a Smith set of only two members

4 January 2020

• curprev 02:1802:18, 4 January 2020‎ BetterVotingAdvocacy talk contribs‎ 354 bytes +354‎ Created page with ""If the pairwise champion exists, they will be the only candidate in the Smith set; otherwise, the Smith set will have three or more members." If there are two weak Condorcet..."