| Display title | Talk:Distributed Score Voting |
| Default sort key | Distributed Score Voting |
| Page length (in bytes) | 6,236 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 1665 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | ParkerFriedland (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 05:29, 8 February 2020 |
| Latest editor | Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 19:33, 9 February 2020 |
| Total number of edits | 18 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | On your criteria table, you say that DSV passes the participation criterion while failing the consistency criterion. These two criteria are mathematically equivalent in single winner elections so if your method fails consistency it must also fail participation. Condorcet methods are also incompatible with the participation, favorite betrayal, and IIA criteria, thus DSS must fail favorite betrayal and IIA as well. I'm not sure about some of the other criteria that you claim DSV passes, though the number of criteria that you got wrong already puts into question the validity of the entire table. User:ParkerFriedland , 00:29, February 8, 2020 |
