Display title | Talk:Schulze STV |
Default sort key | Schulze STV |
Page length (in bytes) | 8,210 |
Namespace ID | 1 |
Namespace | Talk |
Page ID | 1945 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | Kristomun (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 10:41, 18 March 2020 |
Latest editor | BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 08:30, 1 April 2020 |
Total number of edits | 9 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Schulze STV's party list case is not D'Hondt because Schulze STV passes the Droop proportionality criterion, which is quota-based. No divisor methods pass quota criteria, so Schulze STV's party list case can't be any of them. Most likely, it is LR-Droop, but I haven't proven that. Kristomun (talk) 10:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC) |